Paste your draft and see how long it takes to read silently and aloud. Tuned to standard rates: 200 wpm reading, 130 wpm speaking. Includes a cheat sheet for talk lengths.
Approximate word counts for common talk lengths at three pacing speeds. Aim for the middle column unless you’re a habitual fast or slow speaker.
| Length | Slow (110 wpm) | Standard (130 wpm) | Fast / TED (160 wpm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 minute (elevator pitch) | 110 | 130 | 160 |
| 2 minutes | 220 | 260 | 320 |
| 3 minutes | 330 | 390 | 480 |
| 5 minutes | 550 | 650 | 800 |
| 7 minutes | 770 | 910 | 1,120 |
| 10 minutes (TED talk) | 1,100 | 1,300 | 1,600 |
| 15 minutes | 1,650 | 1,950 | 2,400 |
| 20 minutes (keynote) | 2,200 | 2,600 | 3,200 |
| 30 minutes (lecture) | 3,300 | 3,900 | 4,800 |
| 45 minutes | 4,950 | 5,850 | 7,200 |
| 60 minutes | 6,600 | 7,800 | 9,600 |
Most modern reading-time formulas assume 200 words per minute for an average adult reading silently. Fluent readers cruise at 250–300 wpm; readers tackling unfamiliar or technical material drop to 150 wpm. We use 200 wpm and round up to the nearest whole minute.
For speaking aloud, 130 wpm is the sweet spot for clear delivery — fast enough to feel energetic, slow enough that audiences can keep up. Voice actors record audiobooks at 150–160 wpm. TED speakers average 160 wpm. Slow your pace to ~110 wpm when delivering emotional or technical material so the audience has time to absorb each phrase.
If your text contains lots of numbers, names, technical terms or quoted dialogue, add 10–15% to the spoken time. Audiences need extra processing time on names and figures, and pauses for emphasis stretch the runtime. If you have audience interaction (Q&A, applause, laughter), build in another 15–20% per planned interaction.
Same engine, different focus.
The flagship tool — words, sentences, paragraphs, readability and top-words on one page.
Open word counter →Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn and SMS limits with a live remaining-character indicator.
Open character counter →Flesch, Flesch-Kincaid, Coleman-Liau and ARI — with a plain-English explainer for each.
Open readability checker →